Duck Season, Rabbit Season
This
blog is written by Carole Rutherford and dedicated to the memory of Debbie Storey, who died on May 24th
2005:
Debbie (who had AS) died after the mother of all fights to remove
her son’s names from the ‘at risk register'. She was fighting this decision after allegations that
she and her husband were using their autistic sons to meet their own emotional
needs. They removed their sons from school to educate them
themselves at home because their needs were not being met, and the boys
emotional well being was suffering.
There is a very famous
cartoon staring Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck where they argue with one and
other about what hunting season it is, while trying to convince Elmer
Fudd that it is not the right season for him to be hunting them. It is a
very funny cartoon where the two stars of the show pit their wits
against each other in what is really a fight for survival.
For parents
who have children with autism it is often ‘autism season’.
While I
fully accept that there will be parents who have children with autism
who are not acting in the best interests of their children (parents who have children with autism are like any other cross section
of society) it would appear to me that no matter what method or
directive is being used to try and locate parents who are not acting in
the best interests of their children, parents who have children with
autism remain amongst the most vulnerable parents who are still getting
caught in the line of fire.
Parents who have children with
autism have a history of being at risk and being told that they are not
acting in the best interests of their children.
Ignorance is not
bliss and a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing
when the subject that you know 'a little bit about' is autism.
A
lack of autism specific training and understanding can have a
disastrous impact on the lives of parents as
it did for Debbie Storey and her family.
Many of the signs and
symptoms of autism can be attributed to other things. Parents who have
children with autism can all too often find themselves being pursued by
overzealous professionals who have little or no understanding and have
received no autism specific training.
In 2001 the Department of
Health issued draft guidelines on recognising the signs and symptoms of
children in whom illness is 'induced or fabricated by carers with
parenting responsibilities'. It read like a check list for autism.
Concerns about these guidelines were raised by the autism community and
the National Autistic Society, who met with Jacqui Smith - the then Health
Secretary - and raised grave concerns about
this guidance document and the impact it would have on parents of
children with autism. The guidelines were changed but parents who have
children with autism still find themselves being accused of exaggerating
the needs of their children. In fact parents who push too hard to have
the needs of their children met can sometimes find themselves in the
glare of a very unwelcome spotlight.
Autism-in-Mind met with Lord
Filkin (Minister for Education and Skills) along with the National
Autistic Society and PACE on the 1st of March 2005, following the Debbie
Storey case. This meeting was to highlight the urgent need for front line professionals,
working in social care, to receive appropriate training in autism. All attending
wanted to ensure that families would not have to suffer accusations of
abusing their child in the way that Debbie and her family did.
Despite
this issue being raised at a national level, and 7 years on, the
situation remains the same. There are parents who have children with autism
being told by front line professionals that they are not acting
in the best interests of their children.
Front line professionals still lack appropriate and autism specific training.
There
are concerns growing in the autism community about yet another
initiative aimed at educating front line professionals, enabling them to
spot and handle ‘highly resistant parents’.
Parents who have
children with autism are sometimes seen as 'highly resistant parents',
because they challenge and oppose professionals who have little
understanding of their child and how their condition impacts on their
lives. Parents fight for the needs of their child because their complex, often subtle, and fluctuating needs are not being met.
Just
because a disability can be invisible does not mean that parents are
making up the impact that it can have.
Can
we be assured that professionals who are been trained in practical
strategies to tackle obstructive behaviour and disguised compliance have
also been fully trained to understand and with a depth of knowledge in
autism?
Only when we can be assured that all of our front line
professionals who are working with families with autism have been
appropriately and specifically trained will the autism community at last
be able to feel at peace and trust the professionals in their lives.
Debbie Storey was a member of Autism-in-Mind Campaign Group. Debbie won her fight for her children but then went on to lose her life
because even after proving that she and her husband were not
“consciously or unconsciously using their children to meet their own
needs.” She was too afraid to press the medical professionals to find
out why she was in so much pain and to pursue a diagnosis for herself, when she did it was too late. Her sons now live without their mother who put all her energy into protecting them.
We must fight to ensure that no parent is ever placed in the same position as Debbie.
Carole Rutherford
Campaign Manager and Co-Founder Act Now For Autism
Co-Founder Autism in Mind
2 comments:
Oh my word, this is so true, every word of it.. and we must make it her legacy that parents dont have to keep going through this rubbish because professionals are too ignorant to seek out the truth.
Fabulous blog Carole, I remember the Debbie Storey case very well and can remember the feelings of horror as I read it. That poor family.
Post a Comment